Dark Mode Light Mode
How Lily Allen broke the last break-up taboo for women – we don’t always have to play nice
Substantial damages awarded to academic over Steve Coogan Richard III film

Substantial damages awarded to academic over Steve Coogan Richard III film

Substantial damages awarded to academic over Steve Coogan Richard III film Substantial damages awarded to academic over Steve Coogan Richard III film



Laura Hammond,East Midlands and Lizo MzimbaThe Lost KingThe film told the story of the search for Richard III’s remains in 2012A university academic has been awarded substantial damages after a court ruled the portrayal of him in a Steve Coogan film about the discovery of a Richard III’s remains did have a defamatory meaning.Richard Taylor sued the comedian, who wrote the film The Lost King, as well as his production company Baby Cow, and Pathe Production.It was announced on Monday that Mr Taylor, who was unhappy about the way his character was portrayed, had been successful in his claim.The film, which told the story of the search for the Plantagenet monarch under a Leicester council car park in 2012, will be changed and defamatory comments not repeated.Mr Taylor launched High Court action claiming the film had made him appear “misogynistic” and “weasel-like”.SuppliedRichard Taylor’s lawyers described the settlement as a “defamation David and Goliath moment”The Lost King focused on the role of historian Philippa Langley in the search, which involved archaeologists from the University of Leicester.Mr Taylor was the deputy registrar of the University of Leicester at the time and was later played in the film by actor Lee Ingleby.In June, Judge Jaron Lewis ruled the film portrayed Mr Taylor as having “knowingly misrepresented facts to the media and the public” about the discovery, and as being “smug, unduly dismissive and patronising”, which could be defamatory.The case was due to proceed to trial, but lawyers for Mr Taylor told a hearing on Monday that the parties had settled the claim.’A real warning’Daniel Jennings, defamation partner at Shakespeare Martineau, which represented Mr Taylor, described it as a “defamation David and Goliath moment”.He said: “Individuals often feel unable to speak up against large corporations and well-known personalities, but this win demonstrates that there is recourse when wrongs have been committed.”We live in an era of documentaries, podcasts and very public investigative journalism and there’s a growing trend for film and television productions to be labelled as ‘true accounts’ to grab audience attention and generate media buzz around new releases.”Mr Taylor’s win should act as a real warning for anything looking to use those tactics.”The law is very clear and there are defined routes to compensation for individuals who find themselves misrepresented.”



Source link

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Add a comment Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post
How Lily Allen broke the last break-up taboo for women – we don’t always have to play nice

How Lily Allen broke the last break-up taboo for women – we don’t always have to play nice

Advertisement